Is wikipedia a credible and valid
Is wikileaks reliable posted on in politics wikileaks is reliable in my opinion i think wikileaks is reliable they put information on the internet that is pretty powerful read on as to why people might think they are more trustworthy than many governments. Valid sources are materials used to good judgment is necessary when looking for a valid source as the internet has made information answers cannot be modified by the public 3 it is not a personal website a lot of pe ople look at wikipedia, yahooanswers, and even this site as. Wikipedia- is it a credible and valid source of information wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia it contains millions of articles and depends mainly on volunteers and contributors to ensure that information are up to date. Reliability and validity are important concepts within psychometrics reliability is generally thought to be necessary for validity, but it does not guarantee validity reliability and validity are, conceptually, quite distinct and there need not be any necessary relationship between the two be. This measure is reliable, but no valid (that is, it's consistent but wrong) the second, shows hits that are randomly spread across the target when we look at reliability and validity in this way, we see that, rather than being distinct.
Choosing credible sources when a writer uses a book or published article as a source in a research paper, there are not many questions to ask about the credibility of that source examples of wikis include wikipedia, wiktionary, and wikiquotes. A more sophisticated standard for evaluating credibility of information is to read the material and then decide if it is credible this is a complex process that involves many factors one of the. 2 wikipedia: a valid and credible source of information finding credible and valid sources of information online is not an easy task this is mainly because of the information explosion in the internet. Is wikipedia a credible source - it's the go-to website for information on just about anything but is the info on wikipedia worth it's weight in megabytes trace has the answer and tells us about a new plan to up the accuracy of some of its most popular pages read more: ucsf fi.
Students debate value of wikipedia as reliable source by matthew ashman-mar 26, 2012 facebook twitter google+ pinterest whatsapp since its introduction in 2001, wikipedia has grown to host more than 19 million articles with 82,000 contributors in more than 270 languages. Credible versus non credible sources credible sources are ones the reader can trust website anyone can post to, like wikipedia primary and secondary sources what is a primary source a primary source is a document, speech, or other piece. It can be challenging to determine whether a website you're using is credible, but here are a few things to look for: author - information on the internet with a listed author is one indication of a credible site. Wikipedia is about as good a the free, open-access encyclopedia, has taken a great deal of flak in the press for problems related to the credibility of its authors and many critics have tried to downplay its role as a source of valid information and have often pointed to.
Is wikipedia a credible and valid
How do you know if health information you read can be trusted evaluating health information helps you know if the source is reliable learn more. How can my students know if a web source is reliable internet windows tech ease: students often uncritically accept information they see in print or on the internet students should be encouraged to carefully evaluate sources found on the internet the evaluation tool (below) will help.
Should you use wikipedia as a credible resource no, because even though wikipedia is one of the webs most popular reference sites, it isnt a credible resource because anyone is allowed to be a contributor to. Over the last few years, the usefulness of google scholar has really improved i used it when updating a literature review recently (i'm cool, i know) and was pleased with how easy it was to use i did find credible resources during this process, too but, is it as credible as other. Now that you now what to look for in a credible source, let's talk about what are considered credible sources can i find credible sources at my university's library in general what about wikipedia is that a credible source. Introduction to validity and reliability in research the concern of an investigator is how to minimize possible errors and bias by maximizing the reliability and validity of data this then requires that the tool for the collection of data is valid and reliable. Free essay: is wikipedia a credible source of information from learning experience i was involved in a project where i had to research parent and subsidiary.
Is wikipedia a valid source please provide evidence, no yes or no answers thank you wikipedia is not a credible source wikipedia is not a valid source because people can change things about the information. Wikipedia is it a credible and valid source wikipedia is it a credible and valid source many students use wikipedia as a source for valid information when. Using unreliable sources in an academic paper can weaken the credibility of the writer a free, comprehensive, peer-reviewed, award-winning open text for students and wikipedia: wikipedia is an online open-source encyclopedia. A stand against wikipedia middlebury's history professors, as a department, tell students they can't cite the popular (and not always accurate) web encyclopedia by scott jaschik january 26, 2007. Identifying the concept of writing an argument properly cite and list outside sources scenario if you were debating with your learning team whether wikipedia is a credible and valid source of information or whether wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything, and as a quick ready reference.